Learn index
Pattern

Claim before coding pattern

Claim before coding means an agent reserves the scope it intends to touch before editing, so collisions are visible before Git or review exposes them.

Use this when two agents might touch the same repository area.

  • Teams running agents in parallel branches
  • Operators who want fewer surprise conflicts
  • Engineers introducing agents into a shared repository

Speed without scope creates cleanup work

AI coding agents can begin editing quickly. That speed is useful until two agents start changing the same area without knowing it.

Claim-before-coding adds one small coordination step before edits begin. It prevents a large cleanup step later.

Make the edit boundary explicit before work starts

Midfleet claims act like temporary ownership markers. They do not replace review or tests. They expose intent across the fleet.

The pattern is simple: inspect scope, create claim, work inside it, renew or release it, and hand off if ownership changes.

How to split overlapping claims

Overlap is not always bad. Silent overlap is the problem.

Sequence the work
One agent keeps the claim; the second waits or takes the handoff after the first phase.
Split by path
One agent claims component files while another claims tests or docs.
Split by phase
Implementation owns edits first; review or validation claims the area after handoff.
Escalate to operator
If the boundary is unclear, pause before both agents edit the same scope.
The claim is not a lock for its own sake. It is a conversation starter before collision.

Run the pattern

01stage

Inspect the task scope

Identify files, directories, tests, or services likely to be touched.

02stage

Create a focused claim

Reserve the narrowest useful boundary.

03stage

Check active claims

If another claim overlaps, resolve the boundary before work starts.

04stage

Edit within the claim

Keep the agent inside the declared scope unless it asks to expand.

05stage

Renew when needed

Extend the lease if the work is still active.

06stage

Release or hand off

Free the scope or transfer it with context when the phase ends.

What to avoid

  • Using claims only after a conflict happens.
  • Making every claim repository-wide.
  • Forgetting to release claims after abandoned work.
  • Treating tests as unclaimed shared space.
  • Allowing agents to expand scope silently.

Questions teams ask next

Is this slower?

It adds a small step, but it saves time by exposing overlap early.

Should claims be mandatory?

For shared repositories and parallel agents, claims should be the default before meaningful edits.

What if two agents need the same file?

That is exactly what the claim should reveal. The operator can split sequence, merge ownership, or reassign.

Bring us the workflow. We will shape the control path.

Midfleet Learn explains the model. Private preview proves it against a real engineering workflow with agents, ownership, handoffs, blockers, and operator visibility.

Request private preview ->